Samuel Nndwambi’s murder conviction was overturned. But only after he spent 12 years in prison
He says he can never forgive the state
“Twelve years,” he says, slapping his hands together and shaking his head. “Twelve years. Twelve years.”
Samuel Ntshavheni Nndwambi was a carpenter and breadwinner for his wife and three children. One late afternoon in early 2006, Samuel was completing a table for a client in his home carpenter workshop in Thohoyandou when police came to arrest him.
“I was shocked. When I asked the police why they were arresting me, they said, ‘We will talk when we get there.’” A few months later, after a brief trial, Samuel was transported to Kutama Sinthumule maximum security prison to begin a life sentence for murder. He was 39 years old.
On 14 June 2018 the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) ordered his immediate release, saying that then Acting Judge Ephraim Makgoba had convicted Samuel on scant evidence.
“Life is hard in prison, especially when you know you are innocent,” says Samuel. “You get up in the morning and you know you did nothing. And you’re amongst people who have actually committed violent crimes. You are lost. You don’t know what you are doing there, but there’s nowhere to go.”
Interviewed in Thohoyandou, Samuel’s eyes dart around the room. He rubs his legs and shifts in his chair while speaking about his time in prison. Next to him sits one of his three co-accused, former taxi driver Marcus Mulaudzi, who is calm and soft-spoken. Marcus was released in 2016 after a successful appeal to the SCA. He served ten years of his life sentence.
The deceased in the murder case was Shavhani Ramusetheli, a school principal from Thohoyandou. The first and second accused were Leroy Mushweu and Piet Mudzugu, both of whom are still in prison. Marcus and Samuel were the third and fourth accused.
“They had enough evidence to convict accused number one,” says advocate Agnes Ramanyimi of Sigwavhulimu Attorneys, who was part of both successful appeals. She explains that DNA matching Mushweu’s was found on the crime scene. “But Mushweu tried to extricate himself by implicating Marcus and Samuel, claiming that he was pressured by Samuel to commit the crime and that Marcus had driven them to the scene in his taxi,” she says.
According to the SCA, Mushweu’s testimony was the only evidence the state had against Samuel and Marcus, and could not be relied upon to convict. “No evidence was led by the state other than that of the accused who incriminated his co-accused,” the judgment states.
Marcus says he had only met Mushweu twice. “He had a girlfriend in Shayandima [a village in Thohoyandou] and took my taxi there twice,” he says. Samuel says he was only briefly acquainted with his co-accused.
Samuel was represented by Legal Aid South Africa before Sigwavhulimu Attorneys’ involvement. “Ten years represented by Legal Aid and nothing happens! … Until Sigwavhulimu came along.” Legal Aid SA subsequently informed GroundUp that they had in fact only represented Samuel for two years and eight months (see their full response below).
Ramanyimi says she became aware of Samuel through her involvement as counsel on Marcus’s case. “We looked at the court records and thought it would only be just to assist [Samuel] as well,” says Ramanyimi. “We approached his sister first and got to know the family. We went to him in prison to ask if we could represent him. We then terminated the mandate of Legal Aid, and that is when we started with the paperwork.”
In order to appeal against a conviction one has to have trial transcripts, but these cost money. “Something needs to be done about this,” says criminal law expert William Booth. “The costs in some of the appeals I have dealt with were between R18,000 to R100,000 to have the record transcribed. These costs need to be borne by the appellant. This means often the appellant cannot carry on with his appeal.”
Booth says that indigent appellants represented by Legal Aid should be able to access their court records for free. But after the lack of progress with Legal Aid Samuel was now represented privately and would have to pay for the records, which Ramanyimi says cost R37,000. “He didn’t have the money, so we paid for the transcripts and represented him pro bono,” says Ramanyimi.
Samuel’s sister Florence Thinyelo Nndwambi is a tailor who says she earns R800 to R1,000 a month. “I contributed what I could towards the transcripts but it is difficult just to get by so, it was tough to contribute anything,” she says.
Marcus says he was only able to appeal because he got help from his cousin Sam Mulaudzi.
“I paid about R500,000 assisting him over a period of about ten years” says Sam, who is an entrepreneur in the construction business.
“There can sometimes be rich-man’s justice,” says senior journalist Carolyn Raphaely of the Wits Justice Project, which investigates miscarriages of justice in the criminal justice system. “I think Legal Aid lawyers are also very overworked and this often means things take longer to get done,” says Raphaely.
“The most difficult thing for me was the fact that my family had been evicted from where we were living and I couldn’t do anything to prevent it,” says Samuel. “Until today, we don’t have a place that is really ours.”
Prison life and release
“The worst thing for me was constantly living in fear,” says Marcus of his time in prison. “People would get stabbed while I was watching.” He says one of his cellmates often got violent. “I just felt unsafe all the time,” he says. “Also, when the wardens were having their own quarrels everybody would get a beating, for nothing.” He says they sometimes had to wait up to four days for medical treatment after a beating by the wardens.
“I prayed everyday. I accepted that even if I die tomorrow, it’s fine, because I am dying believing in God,” says Marcus.
“Believing in myself helped me to keep going from day to day,” says Samuel. “I also sprinkled snuff and declared my belief to my ancestors.” He says he didn’t make any friends in prison. “I became used to the people who were with me in my cell, but they were just people I lived with. I would not call them friends.”
On the day he was released, Samuel says he was busy doing his laundry when he was called. “It was about 4pm. I was actually scared because I wasn’t sure where they were taking me. It might be a lie. Anything was possible there, so I refused.” He said only when a senior warden came to explain was he willing to comply.
He returned home to his wife and children. “All my friends left. It is only family now,” says Samuel. “My child who is working is the one who bought me the clothes I am wearing right now. He also buys the food that I eat everyday. They are happy that their dad is back.” He says he no longer has carpentry tools or a workshop space and his employment prospects are slim.
When Marcus was released two years ago he found that his wife had left and his child had dropped out of school. “After I left, things fell apart. The family just split. They didn’t have any direction because they depended on me,” says Marcus.
“I was confused as to where do I go. Where do I stand? What do I do?” He says his friends came on the day to see if he was really out and he didn’t see them again. He now lives in a dilapidated house with his mother. “It is humiliating to go from earning good money and providing for my family to here.”
This judgment is one of several handed down at the Thohoyandou High Court that were subsequently overruled by the SCA. On 29 March 2017 the SCA set aside Nndwambi Mudau and Tshivhangwalo Rathogwa Mudau’s life sentences which Acting Judge Makgoba had handed down on 14 July 2003. The SCA said the trial contained “gross procedural irregularities” and that the right to a fair trial had been infringed. Life sentences were also set aside on 30 November 2015 in the case of Khavhadi v the State (459/15) and on 31 March 2014 in the case of Tshakwata and Another v the State (522/13), the SCA citing lack of reliable evidence.
The National Registry of Exonerations in the USA has identified 2,271 exonerations since 1989 in that country alone, the equivalent of “more than 20,080 years lost”. According to Raphaely, this registry is unique globally. She says in South Africa there are no proper statistics for the amount of wrongfully convicted people. “It is difficult to solve a problem when you don’t know its scope … I think prosecutors tend to underplay its prevalence,” says Raphaely.
Felicia Sithole of Statistics South Africa confirmed that the state agency does not collect data on wrongful convictions.
Asked if he thinks he will ever be able to forgive Mushweu and the state, Samuel shakes his head vigorously. “No, no, no. Never.”
“I may say now that I could forgive but every time I saw accused number one [in prison] I got angry. I boiled up,” says Marcus. “The thought of forgiving him doesn’t really cross my mind. I don’t think I will be able to forgive the state … I think there is no justice.”
Dodgy people are suing us. Please support us by contributing to our legal costs and helping us to publish news that matters.
Next: Outstanding provident fund contributions: workers will have to wait a bit longer
Previous: Sheep shearing shed used as a day care centre for 50 children
Legal Aid South Africa (abbreviated as Legal Aid SA) has noted the contents of the article Samuel Nndwambi’s murder conviction was overturned. But only after he spent 12 years in prison, that appeared on GroundUp’s website on 2 October.
We are grateful for the response opportunities you provided us. Our internal investigations have only concluded this week, and we wish to correct, as a matter of fact, some inaccuracies in the report.
To provide some necessary context – Samuel Nndwambi was accused number 4 in a trial for murder and robbery with aggravating circumstances. Legal Aid SA represented all four accused at the trial, with accused 1 being represented by an internal legal practitioner and the remaining 3 accused being represented by separate Judicare attorneys who were instructed by Legal Aid SA.
The trial was finalised on 22 August 2006 and the accused were sentenced by then Acting Judge Ephraim Makgoba to life imprisonment for murder and 10 years for robbery with aggravating circumstances. The sentences were to run concurrently. We are not sure why leave to appeal was not applied for at this stage, as Legal Aid SA would have approved continuation of legal aid to make an application for leave to appeal in accordance with our policy.
On 13 March 2007, Mr Nndwambi instructed on private brief the same firm of attorneys that represented him in his trial to apply for leave to appeal against the conviction and sentence. Again, this is something that Legal Aid SA would have paid for as per our policy. It is therefore evident that the attorney who Mr Nndwambi instructed did not advise Mr Nndwambi correctly with regard to the fact that legal aid could have been obtained for the leave to appeal application. The leave to appeal application was unsuccessful.
In October 2013, Mr Nndwambi applied for legal aid through the Legal Aid SA Thohoyandou Local Office. Our High Court Unit Paralegal went to consult with him on 3 October 2013, where he requested Legal Aid SA to assist him with lodging a petition to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA). A file was opened for Mr Nndwambi and the matter was allocated to High Court Unit legal practitioner, Mr Lucky Thomu. Mr Thomu consulted the client on 23 October 2013, where he took full instructions and also completed the Power of Attorney. Therefore, Legal Aid SA only became involved again in this matter in October 2013; just over 7 years after his trial.
Mr Thomu applied for the transcribed records on 29 October 2013 in order to prepare the petition application. Despite repeated follow ups with the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development (DoJ&CD) for these records, Mr Thomu only received the complete set of records from the Registrar in early June 2016. It is widely known that there was a backlog in the processing of court records at the DoJ&CD during this period and this would be the main reason for the delay in receiving the complete court records in this matter. Mr Nndwambi did inform Mr Thomu during this period that he had an incomplete set of transcribed records which he handed to Mr Thomu in February 2016. However, these were insufficient to draft the petition application. Immediately upon receiving the complete set of transcribed records, Mr Thomu drafted the petition application, which was filed at the SCA on 22 June 2016. The transcribed records were provided to Legal Aid SA by the registrar, free of any charge.
It is important to note that Mr Nndwambi indicated in his founding affidavit for the petition to the SCA that up until 2011 he was not aware that he could take the matter further through petition. He learnt about this during 2011 from other inmates but only approached Legal Aid SA during 2013.
Subsequent to the drafting and lodging of the petition on 22 June 2016, our instruction was terminated by Mr Nndwambi on 22 July 2016, who then appointed a private attorney who had been successful in securing the release of another co-accused in the matter in May 2016. The petition that was filed by our practitioner was successful and Mr Nndwambi was granted leave to appeal in January 2017. However, the appeal was not timeously prosecuted and it lapsed. Condonation was subsequently granted by the SCA and Mr Nndwambi’s appeal was set down for August 2018. Based on the papers that were filed, as well as the concessions provided by the State, as well as its referral to another recent judgment which had a direct impact on this matter, the SCA bench of judges upheld the appeal in June 2018 without having to have a formal appeal hearing.
It is however strange that the private attorney had to pay approximately R37,000 for the record as this was already transcribed and all that was required of them was to pay for a copy of the record. Alternatively, they could have approached Legal Aid SA for the copy, noting that we would have had same because we filed the petition.
Having had regard for the events that transpired, it is clear that Legal Aid SA only received instructions for the petition application in October 2013 and our mandate was terminated in July 2016, after the petition was lodged. Therefore, notwithstanding that Mr Nndwambi was incarcerated for a period of 12 years since the trial, Legal Aid SA was only on record for 2 years and 8 months during this period. It is therefore factually incorrect for Mr Nndwambi to indicate in your article that Legal Aid SA represented him for 10 years and “nothing happened”. Besides indicating an incorrect time period of representation, Mr Nndwambi also fails to acknowledge that the petition application that we lodged was successful, which then made the subsequent appeal proceedings possible.
Legal Aid SA has a proud history of successful litigation at the SCA. During the 2017/18 financial year, Legal Aid SA had 30 appeal matters at the SCA with the majority (16) having successful outcomes. The Legal Aid SA Thohoyandou Local Office has also distinguished itself with a high success rate of matters that have gone on appeal to the SCA in the past. Some of these successful matters are reflected below:
1. Khavhadi and 2 others v The State (459/15)  ZSCA 191 (30 November 2015), where conviction and sentence of life imprisonment was overturned and the accused were released.
2. MM v S (542/11)  ZSCA (8 March 2012), wherein the conviction and sentence of life imprisonment was set aside and replaced by 10 years.
3. Mabunda v S (765/1)  ZSCA (27 March 2013), wherein the sentence of 30 years’ imprisonment was set aside and replaced by 12 years.
4. Azwihangwisi Mmbooi v The State (167/12)  ZSCA 142 (28 March 2012), wherein the sentence of 38 years’ imprisonment was set aside and replaced with 20 years’ imprisonment.
5. Nekuvule v The State (828/13)  ZSCA 24 (27 March 2014), wherein the sentence of life imprisonment was set aside.
Legal Aid SA has no doubt that, had we remained on this matter, we would have had a similar successful outcome for Mr Nndwambi.
When you read of these circumstances, and then wonder to yourself, what would have happened had he been sentenced to death and had been hung. How can anyone be in favour of the 'death sentence'.
© 2018 GroundUp.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.