Maitland residents refuse to be “squeezed” into temporary structures
City of Cape Town says the Royal Road informal settlement needs to be reconfigured to make space for a community centre
- The City of Cape Town says a new community centre will be built in Maitland to provide health services.
- But part of the land needed for this is occupied by an informal settlement of 24 households.
- The City has offered 18 temporary units to reconfigure the area and make space for the new centre.
- But not all residents are willing to accept the proposal.
Residents of the Maitland Royal Road informal settlement in Cape Town have mixed feelings about temporary housing structures being built for them by the City.
“They want to squeeze us into a three-by-six-metre structure,” said Jesica Fortuin, who shares her home with ten other family members. She is refusing to be moved.
The settlement, located across from Maitland Secondary School, is home to 24 households. According to the City it has to be reconfigured (reblocked) to make space available for a new community day centre to be built.
Mayco Member for Human Settlements Malusi Booi said the land belongs to the province. “The Western Cape government and City have identified an area on the same site, which will be used as a Temporary Relocation Area in order for the development to proceed,” said Booi.
The City will accommodate 15 families with three extra units to accommodate the larger families.
However, “some residents will remain in their existing structures due to their current location in the established TRA,” he said.
He said the City will also provide full flush toilets, water and electricity.
The settlement currently has one outside tap, three portable toilets, and a container for residents to dispose of their waste.
“It is important to note that this settlement has been in existence for many years. The development of the TRA will enhance the appearance of the settlement and will provide services to the residents of the informal area,” said Booi.
But Fortuin and about eight other households are unhappy with the proposal. She said the new units are too small and too crowded together.
Fortuin has lived in Royal Road for ten years. She said discussions with the City began in 2018 when there were only 17 households.
“I was told that if I accepted the structure, they would accommodate my sister and her three children. But these places are too small. So, I would have to move into a structure with seven people. That’s impossible,” she said.
Meanwhile Willem De Wet is keen to move. He is unemployed and lives alone in a small, makeshift structure. A new unit would be “so much better” he said, but he is uncertain about how structures will be allocated
“I’ve been living here for more than 17 years … I was so happy when I saw them building structures, but now there are people who have been here for barely a year and they are being promised a place, but I’m not,” he said.
Theodore-Anthony Moses, who was also at first excited to see the new structures “finally” being built, said, “These places are far too small for us. There isn’t even a yard or any place to hang your washing. We cannot live this way, especially those of us who have been here for so many years.”
Moses lives with his wife and four other family members.
Kashiefa Achmat, from the Housing Assembly, criticised the temporary relocation area as unsafe in terms of fires.
Jandré Bakker, spokesperson for Western Cape public works, said the development is still in the planning stages and there is not yet a fixed date for when construction will begin on the community day centre.
Dodgy people are suing us. Please support us by contributing to our legal costs and helping us to publish news that matters.
Next: Property developer forced to rebuild homes it demolished
Previous: Children caught using cannabis will no longer be criminally prosecuted
© 2022 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.
We put an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We do not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please do not delete the invisible pixel.