Health policy has become a confused mess
The health department has withdrawn welcome changes to isolation, quarantine and contact tracing policies
On 23 December the Director-General of Health announced major changes to Covid policy:
- Contacts of people who tested positive would no longer need to quarantine. Previously they had to quarantine for two weeks.
- The health department would stop tracing the contacts of people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2.
- With some caveats, people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 would have to isolate for eight days, down from ten.
The announcement was unclear in parts. It contained an impractical demand that positive people wear a mask at all times at home. Experts had also recommended isolation be reduced to five days. But for once the government had acted swiftly following expert advice, so the announcement was welcome progress.
Good reasons were given for the policy change. Hospitals have not been overwhelmed during the current fourth wave of infections and there have been far fewer Covid deaths. This is a consequence of about half of adults having received at least one vaccine dose, the high rate of people with some immunity from being previously infected and, possibly, that the omicron variant is less virulent. Also omicron is so infectious that contact tracing has become entirely impractical. There have been so many health workers and other government workers quarantining that service delivery has been suffering.
Then on 28 December the weirdest statement was published by the health department, withdrawing the 23 December policy change. The reasons are unclear. Apparently some unidentified people complained, so the health department with exemplary bureaucratic prose states: “Thus, in line with the principles of transparency and openness, the department has decided to put the implementation of the revised policy changes on hold, while taking all additional comments and inputs received into consideration. This means the status quo remains, and all prior existing regulations with regards to contact tracing, quarantine and isolation remain applicable.”
This confusion comes while a good deal of the country is on vacation, and after nearly two years of lockdowns and restrictions that are now barely adhered to or enforced. The reversal further undermines confidence in government, and will likely worsen whatever poor adherence there is to Covid protocols. It sends this signal: the government is weak and unwilling to stand by its own decisions.
This muddle has come about because of a mish-mash of overlapping responsibilities and lack of leadership. Who is now the boss?
When the state of disaster was declared in March 2020, the government set up a Ministerial Advisory Committee (MAC) and a National Coronavirus Command Council. The then Minister of Health, Zweli Mkhize, began issuing daily statements on the number of Covid deaths, a task that is the role of the civil service (i.e. health officials) and not policy makers. Meanwhile policy decisions appeared to be coming from the command council with some input from the MAC.
Mkhize was then engulfed in a particularly distasteful corruption scandal and compelled to resign. Joe Phaahla, who is trying hard and is understated, has seemingly taken a back seat while formerly acting DG Nicholas Crisp has often ended up defending government policy in the media. The Minister’s name doesn’t even appear on the revised policy statement of 23 December.
This is not the way things should be done. The Minister must issue policy changes and unequivocally take responsibility for them. Health officials should be implementing policy. When a justified policy improvement, like the one of 23 December, is made, the Minister should defend it or even improve it. We are still in a state of disaster: leadership, not prevarication, is as vital as ever.
Dodgy people are suing us. Please support us by contributing to our legal costs and helping us to publish news that matters.
Next: What happened to the Lottery money paid to fund games for intellectually impaired athletes?
Previous: Desmond Tutu was a moral voice for South Africa and the world
© 2021 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.
We put an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We do not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please do not delete the invisible pixel.