Duncan Village residents chase away government officials
Residents upset that officials were accompanied by people affiliated to the ward councillor who they say has neglected them
- Community members of Section C in Duncan Village chased away Human Settlements officials coming to inspect dilapidating houses in the area.
- The inspection follows questions sent by GroundUp after residents complained that they had been trying in vain to get the government to assist families living in houses that were built more than three decades ago.
- A resident explained that they were upset that officials were accompanied by people affiliated to the ward councillor whom they believe has neglected them.
Human Settlements officials who came to inspect dilapidating houses in Section C in Duncan Village, East London were chased away by residents last week.
The inspection followed after GroundUp sent questions to the provincial department following complaints by residents. The residents had been trying in vain to get the government to assist families living in dilapidated houses that were built more than three decades ago.
Most of the tenants are pensioners and the area has, over the years, become densely populated with shacks. Residents say the formal houses have asbestos roofs, are leaking and some have already partially collapsed with people inside. But what worries them the most is shack fires especially since many people in the area are elderly and would struggle to escape a fire.
But Human Settlements spokesperson Yanga Funani said officials were prevented from visiting the homes of two residents in need of urgent assistance by people opposed to ward councillor Clara Yekiso-Morolong.
“Our officials have been prevented from doing their work and visiting these families. We are engaging with the Buffalo City Metro to find a way for our officials to meet these families and fast-track their transit to decanting sites where they will await their homes,” he said.
Meanwhile, 81-year-old Watina Betana has lived in his Section C home for more than 30 years. He said for years they were instructed not to “tamper with the structure of the houses” because they had no title deeds. “Over time we were promised title deeds but later that changed and we were told that the government wants to relocate us to RDP houses to make way for a new development,” he said.
Betana said that if had he had known that government would not move them, he would have fixed the house’s faults with his own money.
His neighbour, Nomvulo Dumile, said they worry about Betana and other elderly residents because shack fires are common occurrences. The shacks built around the houses have already burnt twice this year, with the fire in June resulting in someone’s death.
Dumile said that while Betana does get an old age grant, he relies on the community to help him buy groceries, cook for him, do his laundry and other domestic chores.
When asked why they had chased away the officials, Dumile said the community were upset that the department was accompanied by people affiliated to councillor Yekiso-Morolong whom they believe has neglected them.
She said they are also opposed to residents like Betana being moved to another site because he relies on the community for his day-to-day needs. “These people are going to be moved into bungalows. That is not an ideal situation for Betana because he doesn’t know anybody in those bungalows. If the government is unable to fix his house they must put him in another house where we can still have access to him to ensure that he eats and takes his treatment,” she said.
Provincial spokesperson for Social Development Mzukisi Solani said it will also send social workers to do an assessment on the living conditions of vulnerable people in the area.
Dodgy people are suing us. Please support us by contributing to our legal costs and helping us to publish news that matters.
Next: Activists urge Ramaphosa to move N2 Wild Coast Toll Road
Previous: Fifteen years later still no footbridge for Cape Flats’ school children
© 2021 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.
We put an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We do not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please do not delete the invisible pixel.