| CAPE TOWN

Court orders Home Affairs to renew asylum seekers’ documents

By

A “big relief for thousands” says refugee organisation

Photo of people in queue
Asylum seekers stand outside the Home Affairs office on Cape Town’s foreshore.
Photo: Tariro Washinyira
By

Last week, the Western Cape High Court ordered Home Affairs to extend or renew the permits of refugees living in the Western Cape whose permits were originally obtained in other provinces.

Bernard Toyambi, Director of immigrant rights organisation PASSOP, said that since February 2015, Home Affairs has been refusing to renew such documents. More than 1,000 people have complained to PASSOP and other organisations working with refugees. A list of their names was submitted as evidence.

“Many of these refugees cannot afford to travel back to the places where they originally applied — like Musina, Durban and Port Elizabeth. They face a possibility of losing jobs, business and getting arrested,” said Toyambi.

“We welcome the judgment … It’s a big relief to thousands of asylum seekers we serve. We also thank Legal Resource Centre for their persistence. We believe that the Department of Home Affairs will comply with the court order.”

The court ordered Home Affairs to extend or renew at the Cape Town Temporary Refugee Facility (previously known as the Cape Town Refugee Office) all asylum seeker permits originally obtained in terms of section 22 of the Refugees Act for a period of no less than three months.

Applicants cannot be denied or refused renewal if they originally applied for asylum at a refugee office other than Cape Town or if their file cannot be found. Nor can it be made conditional on them reporting to an office other than Cape Town.

This order remains valid until the resolution of each application for asylum, including any internal appeals or any legal disputes challenging the closure of the Cape Town Refugee Office.


Under the order, the offices of Home Affairs at Customs House on Cape Town’s foreshore must process the applicants “regardless of whether those offices are considered to be a Refugee Reception Office”.

© 2016 GroundUp. Creative Commons License
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.

TOPICS:  Government Home Affairs Human Rights Immigration

Next:  Sea Point workers march against Tafelberg sale, as objection period ends

Previous:  Why Tafelberg sale should proceed