Minister and Lottery board “at war” over new chair
Numerous Lottery grants are being investigated for corruption
- Members of the National Lotteries Commission (NLC) board have objected to Trade and Industry minister Ebrahimn Patel extending the term of his representative as its acting chairperson.
- Patel addressed the Trade and Industry Parliamentary Portfolio Committee to get its input.
- Communications between the board and the minister trying to address corruption in the NLC has been reduced to lawyers’ letters and official correspondence.
Relations between Minister of Trade and Industry Ebrahim Patel and the board of the NLC are now largely reduced to exchanges of lawyers’ letters and official correspondence.
This became evident on Wednesday when the minister addressed the Trade and Industry Parliamentary Portfolio Committee, which has oversight responsibility of the Lottery, at a virtual meeting.
The battle between Patel and the NLC has also involved briefings to selected media, as well as leaks of letters and documents.
Patel had requested a meeting with the portfolio committee to discuss the extension of the term of Zandile Brown, his representative on the NLC board and its acting chairperson. Brown, whose term as acting chair ends at midnight on 31 March, was appointed in the acting position after the 11-year tenure of the NLC’s former scandal-ridden chairperson Alfred Nevhutanda.
The NLC board and the minister have been at war over the appointment of Brown. Four members of the board wrote to Patel claiming that he did not have the authority to appoint an acting chairperson, and it was their responsibility to make the appointment.
Patel struck a cautious note, telling the committee that he had sought legal advice and was told that he had the authority to appoint an acting chairperson until such time as a full time appointment was made.
According to Patel, he now has three options: to appoint an outsider as chairperson of the board, appoint another member of the NLC, or extend Brown’s acting term “for a short period” until a new permanent chairperson is appointed.
Dean MacPherson, DA shadow minister for trade and industry, said, “This is not even a low grade civil war taking place between the minister and the NLC. It is a full scale nuclear war that is unfolding. This is for obvious reasons … there is entrenched patronage and access to millions of rands that is at play here.”
Patel declined to identify the four board members who had written to him. But there are currently only five NLC board members and it seems highly improbable that Brown, as the minister’s representative on the board, is one of them. The other members are Advocate William Huma, who applied for the vacant chairperson post but did not make the final shortlist of three, Ms Doris Dondor, Ms Yaswant Gordhan and Dr Muthuhadini Madzivhandila, who was placed third on the shortlist. (GroundUp recently reported that R5 million was paid towards Huma’s house by an organisation that received an NLC grant.)
“It would be very helpful to remove uncertainty by getting any thoughts that the portfolio committee may have,” Patel said. “I hope that … as soon as we have the process completed for a permanent chairperson, the NLC will be able to have this governance issue fully resolved, and that we are all working to ensure that, in fact, the NLC is able to serve the people of South Africa in terms of the Act and within the framework of our Constitution.”
DA MP Mat Cuthbert said, “We would like to ask the minister what action he is going to take against those four board members who have not only launched a fightback campaign against him in the media through strategic leaks but have also threatened legal action against the minister, and have constantly sought to undermine him, even though he has given them sufficient rope.
“We have long called for the NLC … board to be sacked considering the fact that they have all failed to act while the looting continued unabated at the NLC.”
ANC MP Zolile Burns-Ncamashe said, “What I pick up is that the engagement and the communication with [the NLC] or the board, is that they are communicating through letters and so forth, and it shows that there are serious challenges.”
ACDP MP Wayne Thring called on Patel to ensure that “any and every allegation that has been levelled against board members of the NLC must be dealt with so that we have an NLC that is credible, that is transparent, that has the respect … of citizens of South Africa.”
A previous attempt by Patel to appoint a chairperson was derailed after Parliament’s chief legal officer questioned the legality of the process being followed. The process had to be restarted with members of the portfolio committee compiling a shortlist of eight from the 39 candidates, who were then interviewed for the post.
The new shortlist of three names has been submitted to Parliament, which is currently in recess. The National Assembly must first debate and adopt the parliamentary committee’s report on the shortlisting before it is submitted to Patel, who will then appoint one of the three shortlisted candidates as the new permanent NLC board chairperson.
When he extended Brown’s acting appointment to 31 March, Patel said his legal advice was that there was no reason that he should not extend her term for two more months.
Patel previously clashed with the Board when it sent him a lawyer’s letter demanding that he hand over an independent forensic report into allegedly corrupt Lottery-funded projects. The board threatened to drag the minister to court if he refused to hand over the dossier, which had been handed over to the Hawks to investigate.
The Special Investigations Unit (SIU) is also investigating the NLC.
The number of projects being investigated by the Hawks and the SIU has swelled to over 20, with new ones “being added to the list all the time” a well-informed source said.
© 2021 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.
We put an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We do not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please do not delete the invisible pixel.