A few “hiccups” but school feeding on track, education department insists
Civil society takes Minister Motshekga to court for “empty promise”
- Nearly ten million children depend on the National Schools Nutritional Programme.
- The education department says children received their daily meals through the Department of Social Development.
- Equal Education says a snap survey of 70 schools reveals that this is not the case.
- Civil society organisations want the courts to supervise and ensure school feeding is taking place.
The Department of Basic Education says that bar a “few hiccups”, the nationwide schools feeding scheme is up and running. But teachers, parents and learners have told civil society organisations this is not the case.
Director-General Mathanzima Mweli said there is no need for court intervention and Minister Angie Motshekga never backtracked on a promise to reinstate the National Schools Nutrition Programme (NSNP), which feeds about 9.6 million children, irrespective of whether or not they are back at school.
This is in his written response to an urgent application launched in the North Gauteng High Court by Equal Education (EE), supported by the Equal Education Law Centre and SECTION27.
In the matter set down for 2 July, EE wants the court to declare that all qualifying learners, regardless of whether or not they have resumed classes, must receive a daily meal, and that the minister and provincial MECs (barring the Western Cape, which has publicly committed to rolling out school feeding) are in breach of their constitutional duties.
It said a structural interdict is required so that there is court supervision going forward.
But Mweli said feeding continued through the Department of Social Development, even during the hard lockdown, and, at the time of deposing his affidavit, he expected the national nutritional programme to be functioning in all provinces from 22 June.
He said in some provinces, the target of feeding all learners, not just those at school, had been achieved; in others, there were glitches that were being addressed.
“Although nearly all the schools were ready to commence with the programme on 8 June (when most schools opened for grades seven and 12) , everyone had to adapt and adjust to a new reality. It took about two weeks to sort out a few hiccups.
“I am not looking for an excuse, but the harsh reality is that the Government does not have unlimited resources … We could not put all our resources immediately and fully behind only the NSNP.
“We have also put in monitoring systems so that we can pick up any logistical problems on the ground and address situations as they arise in the daily running and operation of the programme,” he said.
But EE general secretary Noncedo Madubedube said Mweli had provided no evidence that meals were now being provided, only “generalised statements of good intention”.
In her affidavit, she said the department did not respond to the personal experiences of learners about the devastating impact the suspension of the programme had had on them.
Recent evidence collected by EE shows that “large numbers” of learners were not being fed.
“On 23 June, we conducted an urgent investigation into what the position is on the ground by contacting a sample of schools, learners and parents.
“In short, it shows that the NSNP has not been rolled out to all qualifying learners in all grades. In Limpopo, even learners in grades seven and 12 are not receiving sufficient food.”
The snap survey was conducted by contacting about 70 schools, 27 parents and several learners in five provinces.
Madubedube urged the court must consider this evidence “in the interests of justice”.
“These are urgent proceedings, affecting the daily breach of the constitutional rights of millions of children. It concerns whether they will continue to go hungry.
“If the department can produce evidence showing that they have complied with their constitutional and statutory obligations, that will bring the litigation to an end.
“The fact is, the commitment to resume the NSNP remains an empty promise,” she said.
© 2020 GroundUp.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.