PARLIAMENT | CAPE TOWN 

Energy minister insists on nuclear

Committee demands clarity on costs but gets none

Photo of Parliament
Parliament of South Africa. Photo: Brent Meersman
By    

The new Minister of Energy, David Mahlobo, appears determined to push ahead with nuclear procurement at an unspecified future date. This is despite the Minister of Finance announcing categorically in the October Medium Term Budget Policy Statement that the country could not afford a nuclear programme and does not have the money to fund one. Also, in April, the Cape High Court ruled that the pending nuclear deal with Russia was “unlawful and unconstitutional”. But Mahlobo insists a nuclear deal is on the cards.

An important update has been added to this story shortly after it was published. See bottom of article.

Addressing the Portfolio Committee on Energy for about two hours on Tuesday, Mahlobo said South Africa is “blessed with uranium that could be extracted for nuclear power”. He told the Committee that the country needs nuclear energy and it remained part of South Africa’s future energy plans. Opponents of nuclear energy could not wish it away, he said. Mahlobo envisages nuclear energy growing to provide as much as 20% of South Africa’s energy by 2030.

While Mahlobo tried to convince MPs that the way forward for energy policy was a “mix” of renewable and non-renewable sources, Committee members fired questions at him demanding clarity.

As to whether a deal was already underway, he would say only that there is no nuclear deal on the table at present, but referred to a tender valued at R100 billion. He said the initial proposed budget of R1 trillion was “not my figure”, but made it clear that a nuclear deal in the future was inevitable.

This raised the ire of committee members who wanted clarity on nuclear plans.

“I want the minister to explain this R1 trillion issue once and for all,” demanded Zukisa Faku (ANC). Gordon Mackay (DA) told the Committee that the Minister “better damn well explain why we need nuclear”. Mackay questioned why when the former energy minister Dipuo Peters had declared a nuclear deal unaffordable, plans to restart the nuclear programme had been revived after a cabinet reshuffle that put Mahlobo in charge. He described the nuclear programme as “shrouded in mystery”.

Mahlobo was until recently the Minister of State Security.

Gavin Davies (DA) said the Energy Minister had failed to give an update on the nuclear build programme, and he wanted to know the costs, updates and affordability of nuclear power.

“[Finance] Minister Gigaba said it is unaffordable,” said Davies. “Do you disagree with your Finance Minister? Where will the money come from?”

Dr Blade Nzimande (ANC) expressed concern about how the costs involved would impact on the poor. Rismati Mavunda (ANC) wanted to know from the Minister how nuclear energy would provide poverty relief. Jan Esterhuizen (IFP) asked the Minister, “How can it be financially justifiable to start a nuclear programme? How will we be able to afford it?”

Mahlobo gave no clear answer to these questions from MPs, answering only, “when the time comes, we will make a plan.”

Chairperson of the Committee Fikile Mahola (ANC) said the Committee needed “absolute clarity” not only for themselves, but also for the public. Mahola said the Committee had called this meeting specifically to deal with this matter.

Meanwhile, on Wednesday protesters gathered first at St George’s Mall where they had invited political parties to take part in a public debate on nuclear energy for South Africa. Only Cope and UDM attended and both parties spoke out against any nuclear deal.

Citizens from as far afield as the Eastern Cape, Northern Cape and the Karoo took part in the protest march to Parliament which followed.

Produced for GroundUp by Notes from the House.

Gigaba flipflops on nuclear energy

Update to the above story published at 13:40 on 23 November 2017

By Moira Levy

Twenty-four hours after Energy Minister David Mahlobo had told the Energy Committee at Parliament on Tuesday that South Africa was going ahead with a policy mix that definitely includes nuclear energy, the Finance Minister Malusi Gigaba appears to have done a flipflop on his mini-Budget declaration in October that South Africa cannot afford nuclear energy.

Gigaba now appears amenable to the nuclear build programme. Business Day quoted him as saying this would be done at a pace and scale that the government could afford. He gave no further details.

Gigaba’s apparent change of heart became even more mystifying after he released a subsequent statement on Thursday declaring his intention to make massive budget cuts to control growing debt. He did not say how this would be achieved and did not mention nuclear spend.

Mahlobo, appears determined to push ahead with nuclear procurement, despite the mixed messages coming from Treasury. At this stage it is difficult to know if the proposed slashes to the Budget will be able to force him to revise his views on nuclear procurement, which has been estimated at a cost of R1 trillion.

So set is Mahlobo on seeing in a nuclear deal that he has disregarded the April Cape Town High Court ruling that the nuclear deal with Russia is “unlawful and unconstitutional” and the civil society threat to take him back to court on charges of contempt of court.

Citizen protests against a nuclear deal continue, but Mahlobo could not have made his view more clear. At the Committee meeting he said opponents of nuclear energy could not wish it away.

© 2017 GroundUp. Creative Commons License
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.