Student protest disrupts UCT activities
Protest centred on the student disciplinary tribunal
Today, more than 150 students and workers marched from the Belmont Square Conference Centre to University of Cape Town (UCT) Upper Campus, singing and interrupting traffic, to protest against outsourcing, low wages for workers, and suspensions and expulsions of student activists.
Protesters first gathered outside Belmont Square, where a tribunal was being held to discuss disciplinary matters concerning three students who were suspended from UCT following protest actions. At least 25 SAPS officers holding weapons and riot shields formed a barrier to keep protesters from entering the centre.
A statement released by ‘SRC candidates of the suspended elections’ for the Student Representative Council cited police violence, campus rape culture, suppression of student activists and free education as issues the university should address.
The group demanded to be allowed into the student disciplinary tribunal as a collective of witnesses for the suspended students, but were told only one person could enter as a witness.
Masixole Mlandu, one of the suspended students and a candidate in the suspended elections, spoke to the crowd at Belmont Square. “We are not going to come one by one — we always come as a unit … If the tribunal does not allow all of you in, we cannot participate.”
The group then marched towards Main Road, Rondebosch, where they halted traffic for several blocks. Along their route to campus, they pulled workers for Sibanye and C3 Catering from their posts to join the protest. They also surrounded a Jammie bus on Woolsack Drive.
Marchers continued through campus, stopping in front of Jameson Hall, where a gymnastics demonstration was taking place. The protesters interrupted the demonstration, forcing the gymnasts to leave. They sang protest songs before a crowd of about 300 UCT students that had gathered.
“The main issue is of suspended and expelled students. It has now been approximately eight months [since the suspensions],” Mlandu told the crowd.
“If UCT is the top university in the continent, they should lead by example and represent the aspirations of the majority of this continent. We are not here to fight, but we don’t mind fighting.”
Student Khululwa Mthi read aloud the statement from suspended candidates for the SRC.
Mam Nozi, a worker, spoke about the struggle of workers on campus. Siroxolo Boyi, a student, explained the tribunal process and the events of the morning for those who were not present. Thebe Longwe, another student, explained that workers and students must join together to protest UCT’s inaction on important issues.
“The workers’ struggle is synonymous to the students’ struggle,” he said. “They are working for these institutions, yet they have nothing to show for it at the end of the day.”
Workers from the strike at Robertson Winery also joined the protest, calling for a boycott of the company until it institutes a living wage for workers.
Mlandu said following the initial suspensions, students had called for a process similar to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, where students and the vice-chancellor would openly discuss the students’ complaints and try to resolve them, but he said they were turned down.
“We wanted an open dialogue instead of a punitive process, but the university refused,” he said.
A statement from UCT spokesperson Kylie Hatton in response to the protest emphasized the small number of students who have been suspended and that they were suspended for acts such as arson and vandalism.
‘Given that thousands of people have engaged in protests, even disruptive ones, over the past 18 months, it is evident that the [Student Disciplinary Tribunal] and interdicts, which involve five students, are not a tactic to undermine protest,’ the statement read.
Acts that undermine the fabric of society are not protests. Protests must be aimed at useful transformation of society and for this reason they must be peaceful, absolutely non-coercive and non-destructive in their effect.
I used to think that the endless toleration of intimidation, violence and destruction in the name of protest at the University of Cape Town was due to weakness in leadership in the UCT Executive. I now believe that I was wrong. Those in power at UCT favour the ‘Fallist’ position foisted on the vast majority of students/staff who just want to learn, debate and research by a small minority of staff, students and ‘others’ allowed to permeate UCT property. They wish to undermine the principles of academic freedom and individual choice. They refuse to hold people who commit criminal acts accountable for them. Otherwise, why are undergraduate students in their mid-30s who don’t attend their lectures, fail most of the courses they deign to register for, assault defenceless women, boycott disciplinary hearings and burn paintings/vehicles/offices allowed to stay on campus and even seek election for student governance?
The simple solution to the problem would be to allow all members of UCT’s community to express their views anonymously (but still self-identify sensu lato) in a transparent, democratic survey as to: whether intimidation, violence and destruction are to be tolerated; courses/literature should be purged from curricula based on the race/gender/age/sex-preference/geographical-provenance of their source; unfettered rational debate be required (not just tolerated); appointments/promotions be based on merit on job-related, delivery-based criteria.
But nothing happens. Why? Because this does not suit the ‘vision’ of the Executive and the pliant Council.
I couldn't agree with Tim Crowe's analysis more. There are well in excess of 20,000 students at UCT, together with their parents, all of whom are making great sacrifices and working hard to improve their lot in life. It simply boggles the mind that a few hundred (at most) wannabe "revolutionaries" have repeatedly brought the university to its knees, not to mention acts of arson, assault and battery against those who stand in their way (including Max Price), intimidation, disruption of exam and classes. I agree with Tim that Max Price IS weak, and further agree that his weakness is, in part, borne of a personal ideology whose roots lie in white guilt.
It is time for students and their parents to assert themselves through the press, through publicised meetings, through petitions, by insisting that UCT Council immediately put an end to the endless "engagement" with thugs whose sole objective appears to be to destroy what has taken generations to establish, and whose destruction will further impoverish the country.
I suggest Council study the University of Stellenbosch and Wits' playbook, and learn from them. It is time to call in public order police, and put an end to the embarrassing spectacle that is playing itself out at UCT.
© 2016 GroundUp.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.