22 July 2020
More than 20 beneficiaries of the Mau Mau housing project in Nyanga have occupied their houses without the City of Cape Town’s approval. They occupied the houses on Saturday, 18 July.
“We were tired of watching our houses being vandalised by criminals. Coming here without the City’s approval is not about undermining them but to protect our houses”, said Lindiwe Sibhozo.
The houses, some still incomplete, are now in poor condition. The occupants claim that they are saving the City a lot of money.
In June, GroundUp reported that beneficiaries of newly built Breaking New Ground houses were unhappy with how the City had been managing the project.
Thembisa Apile, 43, told GroundUp that they did not want to continue staying in shacks while they had houses. “We are the rightful owners of these houses. A further delay in occupying the houses would be disastrous.”
Julia Ngxuluma said she had been using her own money to fix the house. “We are the caretakers of our houses. All we are waiting for now is the City to come and do verification,” said Ngxuluma.
Ward 37 councillor Luyanda Nyingwa said only the Human Settlements department can establish if the people occupying the houses are the real beneficiaries. “At the beginning, they were only 18 but the number jumped to over 20. The only people that can take us out of this situation is the Human Settlements department by doing the verifications,” said Nyingwa.
The City’s Mayoral Committee Member for Human Settlements, Malusi Booi,said the illegal occupation of complete and incomplete units at its Mau Mau housing development “jeopardised the allocation of houses to the rightful beneficiaries, who are mostly elderly, and it is unacceptable”.
Construction of the 432 state-subsidised houses started in 2018 and was expected to be completed by February 2019. In June, Booi said the handover of 14 units had been delayed due to the vandalism of plumbing, electricity, and windows.
According to Booi, 19 units were occupied recently “by what appears to be younger beneficiaries” of this project. He said this was at the expense of older beneficiaries who should be first in the line to receive houses.
“The younger beneficiaries appear lower down on the project list. They would only receive their houses later in the project, but they are now pushing down the elderly beneficiaries so they can benefit first,” said Booi.